<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?><!-- generator=Zoho Sites --><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><atom:link href="https://www.healnc.net/blogs/tag/covid-tests/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><title>Health Empowerment Action League of North Carolina - Blog #COVID tests</title><description>Health Empowerment Action League of North Carolina - Blog #COVID tests</description><link>https://www.healnc.net/blogs/tag/covid-tests</link><lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2025 13:20:35 -0700</lastBuildDate><generator>http://zoho.com/sites/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[14-Year-Old Forced to Get Pfizer Shot Should Be Allowed to Sue Board of Education, CHD Tells N.C. Supreme Court]]></title><link>https://www.healnc.net/blogs/post/14-year-old-forced-to-get-pfizer-shot-should-be-allowed-to-sue-board-of-education-chd-tells-n.c.-sup</link><description><![CDATA[<img align="left" hspace="5" src="https://www.healnc.net/images/14yo teen sue.jpg"/>Children’s Health Defense filed an amicus brief urging the North Carolina Supreme Court to overturn the dismissal of a case involving Tanner Smith, a 14-year-old who was given the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine against his will and without his parents’ consent.]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="zpcontent-container blogpost-container "><div data-element-id="elm_Wy8Pw9RYQJuhmq_vUEIf0Q" data-element-type="section" class="zpsection "><style type="text/css"></style><div class="zpcontainer-fluid zpcontainer"><div data-element-id="elm_bvGv1-IFRrqUDoDCit4Y2Q" data-element-type="row" class="zprow zprow-container zpalign-items- zpjustify-content- " data-equal-column=""><style type="text/css"></style><div data-element-id="elm_7JAPIOarRuW30XEbFDcevg" data-element-type="column" class="zpelem-col zpcol-12 zpcol-md-12 zpcol-sm-12 zpalign-self- "><style type="text/css"></style><div data-element-id="elm_Tx7YCT29Sge-KLwRzwN3uQ" data-element-type="heading" class="zpelement zpelem-heading "><style></style><h2
 class="zpheading zpheading-align-center " data-editor="true"><span style="color:inherit;"><span style="font-size:32px;">14-Year-Old Forced to Get Pfizer Shot Should Be Allowed to Sue Board of Education, CHD Tells N.C. Supreme Court</span>&nbsp;&nbsp;</span><br></h2></div>
<div data-element-id="elm_Jktg0WTdKiag6O0tTET13g" data-element-type="image" class="zpelement zpelem-image "><style> @media (min-width: 992px) { [data-element-id="elm_Jktg0WTdKiag6O0tTET13g"] .zpimage-container figure img { width: 635px !important ; height: 691px !important ; } } </style><div data-caption-color="" data-size-tablet="" data-size-mobile="" data-align="center" data-tablet-image-separate="false" data-mobile-image-separate="false" class="zpimage-container zpimage-align-center zpimage-tablet-align-center zpimage-mobile-align-center zpimage-size-custom zpimage-tablet-fallback-fit zpimage-mobile-fallback-fit hb-lightbox " data-lightbox-options="
                type:fullscreen,
                theme:dark"><figure role="none" class="zpimage-data-ref"><span class="zpimage-anchor" role="link" tabindex="0" aria-label="Open Lightbox" style="cursor:pointer;"><picture><img class="zpimage zpimage-style-none zpimage-space-none " src="/images/14yo%20teen%20sue.jpg" size="custom" data-lightbox="true"/></picture></span></figure></div>
</div><div data-element-id="elm_2Ncx2l73FYTWFBQpy8TQaA" data-element-type="text" class="zpelement zpelem-text "><style></style><div class="zptext zptext-align-left " data-editor="true"><div style="color:inherit;"><div><div>by&nbsp;<a href="https://childrenshealthdefense.org/authors/suzanne-burdick-ph-d/" title="https://childrenshealthdefense.org/authors/suzanne-burdick-ph-d/" target="_blank" rel=""><span style="text-decoration-line:underline;">Suzanne Burdick, Ph.D.</span></a></div></div><div style="font-size:14px;font-weight:600;">July 30, 2024</div></div></div>
</div><div data-element-id="elm_VF2LY_GxRAVYWdz9pUUf5Q" data-element-type="text" class="zpelement zpelem-text "><style></style><div class="zptext zptext-align-left " data-editor="true"><div style="color:inherit;"><p><span><a href="https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/tanner-smith-teenager-forced-covid-vaccination-pfizer-lawsuit/" title="https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/tanner-smith-teenager-forced-covid-vaccination-pfizer-lawsuit/" target="_blank" rel=""><span style="text-decoration-line:underline;">This article was originally published by The Defender</span></a> — Children’s Health Defense’s News &amp; Views Website.</span></p></div></div>
</div><div data-element-id="elm_zfHok3J6oyE_moi5r4UB8Q" data-element-type="text" class="zpelement zpelem-text "><style></style><div class="zptext zptext-align-left " data-editor="true"><div style="color:inherit;"><div style="color:inherit;"><p style="margin-bottom:20px;"><span>Children’s Health Defense (CHD) today filed an&nbsp;<a href="https://childrenshealthdefense.org/wp-content/uploads/Final-7.30.24-CHD-Amicus-Brief_Redacted.pdf" title="https://childrenshealthdefense.org/wp-content/uploads/Final-7.30.24-CHD-Amicus-Brief_Redacted.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener" style="text-decoration-line:underline;">amicus brief</a>&nbsp;urging the North Carolina Supreme Court to overturn the dismissal of a case involving a&nbsp;<a href="https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/teenager-covid-vaccine-without-parental-consent-north-carolina-supreme-court/" title="https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/teenager-covid-vaccine-without-parental-consent-north-carolina-supreme-court/" target="_blank" rel="" style="text-decoration-line:underline;">14-year-old boy</a>&nbsp;who was given the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine against his will and without his parents’ consent.</span></p><p style="margin-bottom:20px;"><span>In August 2022, Emily Happel and her teenage son, Tanner Smith, sued the Guilford County Board of Education and Old North State Medical Society after Smith was given a dose of the Pfizer&nbsp;<a href="https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/unsafe-and-ineffective-film-exposes-pharma-media-lies-safety-covid-shots/" title="https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/unsafe-and-ineffective-film-exposes-pharma-media-lies-safety-covid-shots/" target="_blank" rel="" style="text-decoration-line:underline;">COVID-19 vaccine</a>&nbsp;— which at the time was available only under<a href="https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/chd-lawsuit-supreme-court-fda-emergency-covid-vaccines-kids/">&nbsp;</a><a href="https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/chd-lawsuit-supreme-court-fda-emergency-covid-vaccines-kids/" title="https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/chd-lawsuit-supreme-court-fda-emergency-covid-vaccines-kids/" target="_blank" rel="" style="text-decoration-line:underline;">emergency use authorization</a>&nbsp;(EUA) — by clinic workers at a school vaccination site. The vaccine was administered in August 2021.</span></p><p style="margin-bottom:20px;"><span style="font-size:18px;">Smith and Happel alleged battery, violation of a North Carolina statute prohibiting vaccination with EUA products without parental consent, and constitutional violations.</span></p><p style="margin-bottom:20px;"><span>The trial court&nbsp;<a href="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/24475246-dismissal-in-happel-case" title="https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/24475246-dismissal-in-happel-case" target="_blank" rel="" style="text-decoration-line:underline;">dismissed the case</a>&nbsp;in February 2023 on several grounds, including that the defendants are immune under the federal Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act, or&nbsp;<a href="https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/prep-act-covid-vaccine-injury-liability/" title="https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/prep-act-covid-vaccine-injury-liability/" target="_blank" rel="" style="text-decoration-line:underline;">PREP Act</a>, and that relevant state laws are&nbsp;<a href="https://sgp.fas.org/crs/misc/R45825.pdf" title="https://sgp.fas.org/crs/misc/R45825.pdf" target="_blank" rel="" style="text-decoration-line:underline;">preempted</a>&nbsp;by the PREP Act.</span></p><p style="margin-bottom:20px;"><span>In March 2024, the&nbsp;<a href="https://appellate.nccourts.org/opinions/?c=2&amp;pdf=43095" target="_blank" rel="" style="text-decoration-line:underline;">North Carolina Court of Appeals</a>&nbsp;affirmed the trial court’s dismissal of the lawsuit.</span></p><p style="margin-bottom:20px;"><span></span></p><div style="color:inherit;"><div style="color:inherit;"><p style="margin-bottom:20px;"><span>After Happel and Smith petitioned the&nbsp;<a href="https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/teenager-covid-vaccine-without-parental-consent-north-carolina-supreme-court/" title="https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/teenager-covid-vaccine-without-parental-consent-north-carolina-supreme-court/" target="_blank" rel="" style="text-decoration-line:underline;">North Carolina Supreme Court</a>, the court agreed on May 23 to hear arguments about whether the PREP Act protects the defendants from liability and suit and preempts North Carolina’s laws governing the plaintiffs’ claims. A hearing has yet to be scheduled.</span></p><p style="margin-bottom:20px;font-size:16px;"><a href="https://childrenshealthdefense.org/"><span style="font-size:18px;">CHD</span></a><span style="font-size:18px;">’s amicus brief argues that the lower courts were wrong to interpret the PREP Act as they did because the&nbsp;<a href="https://constitution.congress.gov/">U.S. Constitution</a>&nbsp;does not give Congress authority to nullify state laws governing the in-state activities that gave rise to the plaintiffs’ claims. The brief states:</span></p></div></div></div></div><blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 40px;border:none;padding:0px;"><div style="color:inherit;"><div style="color:inherit;"><div style="color:inherit;"><div style="color:inherit;"><p style="margin-bottom:20px;"><span style="font-size:18px;">“The lower courts wrongly interpreted PREP as nullifying the North Carolina common, statutory, and constitutional law that would otherwise govern those activities and provide a basis for relief to the Plaintiffs, including laws concerning battery, parental rights, bodily autonomy, and informed consent.”</span></p></div></div></div></div></blockquote><div style="color:inherit;"><div style="color:inherit;"><div style="color:inherit;"><div style="color:inherit;"><p style="margin-bottom:20px;"><span style="font-size:18px;">An amicus brief is filed by non-parties to a litigation to provide information that has a bearing on the issues and assist the court in reaching the correct decision. It comes from the Latin term “amicus curiae,” which means “friend of the court.”</span></p><p style="margin-bottom:20px;"><span>Risa Evans, the CHD attorney who wrote the brief, told&nbsp;<a href="https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/" title="https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/" target="_blank" rel="" style="text-decoration-line:underline;">The Defender</a>&nbsp;she thinks it’s wrong to leave parents with no legal recourse after a child is injected with an EUA product over the child’s express objection and without parental consent.</span></p><p style="margin-bottom:20px;"><span style="font-size:18px;">“Parents must have a way to hold the wrongdoers accountable,” Evans said. “I hope the North Carolina Supreme Court agrees that the U.S. Constitution prohibits this result.”</span></p><p style="margin-bottom:20px;font-size:16px;"><span style="font-size:18px;"><a href="https://walkerkiger.com/" title="https://walkerkiger.com/" target="_blank" rel=""><span style="text-decoration-line:underline;">Steven Walker</span></a></span><span style="font-size:18px;">, attorney for the plaintiffs, told The Defender the case is important “because it impacts the ability of parents to direct the medical care that their child receives.”</span></p><p style="margin-bottom:20px;"><span style="font-size:18px;">Walker said:</span></p></div></div></div></div><blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 40px;border:none;padding:0px;"><div style="color:inherit;"><div style="color:inherit;"><div style="color:inherit;"><div style="color:inherit;"><p style="margin-bottom:20px;"><span style="font-size:18px;">“We hope that the Court will determine that Congress did not close the courthouse doors to parents who are attempting to direct the medical care that their child receives. We simply want the Supreme Court of North Carolina to give us our day in court where we can present our case fully.”</span></p></div></div></div></div></blockquote><div style="color:inherit;"><div style="color:inherit;"><div style="color:inherit;"><div style="color:inherit;"><p style="margin-bottom:20px;"><span style="font-size:18px;">Walker said the case is also important because “it impacts the ability of a child — who was 14 at the time — to reject an injection that he did not want to receive.”</span></p><p style="margin-bottom:20px;"><span style="font-size:18px;"></span></p><div style="color:inherit;"><div style="color:inherit;"><p style="margin-bottom:20px;font-size:16px;"><strong><span style="font-size:18px;">PREP Act doesn’t nullify state laws referenced in the case</span></strong></p><p style="margin-bottom:20px;"><span style="font-size:18px;">CHD’s amicus brief highlighted the legal argument behind why the lower courts were wrong to say that the PREP Act nullified North Carolina laws relevant to Happel and Smith’s case.</span></p><p style="margin-bottom:20px;"><span>According to CHD’s brief, federal law reigns supreme “only where the Constitution empowers the Federal Government to act, and Congress can permissibly nullify state law only through statutes enacted pursuant to an&nbsp;<a href="https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artI-S8-1/ALDE_00000259/" title="https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artI-S8-1/ALDE_00000259/" target="_blank" rel="" style="text-decoration-line:underline;">enumerated power</a>.”</span></p><p style="margin-bottom:20px;"><span>“Enumerated powers” are the powers granted to Congress by the Constitution, according to&nbsp;<a href="https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/enumerated_powers" title="https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/enumerated_powers" target="_blank" rel="" style="text-decoration-line:underline;">Cornell Law School’s Legal Information Institute</a>.</span></p><p style="margin-bottom:20px;"><span>The brief argues that the specific enumerated power that Congress relied on when it passed the PREP Act — called “<a href="https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IF/IF11971" title="https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IF/IF11971" target="_blank" rel="" style="text-decoration-line:underline;">Commerce Clause</a>” power — does not give the federal government authority to nullify the state laws that govern the claims in the case.</span></p><p style="margin-bottom:20px;"><span style="font-size:18px;">That’s because the underlying activity — in this case, the vaccination of a minor with an EUA product over his objection and without his parents’ consent — was not “commercial” or “economic” and had virtually no effect on interstate commerce.</span></p><p style="margin-bottom:20px;"><span style="font-size:18px;">Evans said, “Accordingly, as applied by the lower courts, the PREP Act ‘exceeds Congress’ enumerated powers.’”</span></p><p style="margin-bottom:20px;"><span style="font-size:18px;">The brief also urges the North Carolina Supreme Court to instruct the lower courts to adopt a “narrower reading” of the PREP Act’s immunity and preemption provisions, “a reading that enforces constitutional limits on the exercise of federal power.”</span></p><p style="margin-bottom:20px;"><span style="font-size:18px;">CHD isn’t the first or only organization to argue that the PREP Act is unconstitutional.</span></p><p style="margin-bottom:20px;"><span style="font-size:18px;">When the PREP Act was passed back in 2005, several members of Congress voiced concerns about its constitutionality, according to legislative history cited in CHD’s amicus brief.</span></p><p style="margin-bottom:20px;"><span>Since then, these concerns have been echoed in lawsuits brought in&nbsp;<a href="https://childrenshealthdefense.org/wp-content/uploads/LA-PREP-case.pdf" title="https://childrenshealthdefense.org/wp-content/uploads/LA-PREP-case.pdf" target="_blank" rel="" style="text-decoration-line:underline;">Louisiana</a>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<a href="https://childrenshealthdefense.org/wp-content/uploads/TX-PREP-case.pdf" title="https://childrenshealthdefense.org/wp-content/uploads/TX-PREP-case.pdf" target="_blank" rel="" style="text-decoration-line:underline;">Texas</a>&nbsp;by people injured by COVID-19 vaccines.</span></p><p style="margin-bottom:20px;"><span>Last month,&nbsp;<a href="https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/lawsuit-vaccine-injured-strike-down-unconstitutional-prep-act/" title="https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/lawsuit-vaccine-injured-strike-down-unconstitutional-prep-act/" target="_blank" rel="" style="text-decoration-line:underline;">Moms for America and individual plaintiffs</a>&nbsp;who were injured by a COVID-19 vaccine, or whose loved one was injured or killed by a COVID-19 vaccine, sued several U.S. government agencies, alleging the PREP Act violates the U.S. Constitution and the<a href="https://www.epa.gov/laws-regulations/summary-administrative-procedure-act">&nbsp;</a><a href="https://www.epa.gov/laws-regulations/summary-administrative-procedure-act" title="https://www.epa.gov/laws-regulations/summary-administrative-procedure-act" target="_blank" rel="" style="text-decoration-line:underline;">Administrative Procedure Act</a>, which governs how federal agencies develop and issue regulations.</span></p><p style="margin-bottom:20px;"><span>Attorney&nbsp;<a href="https://childrenshealthdefense.org/authors/ray-l-flores-ii-esq/" title="https://childrenshealthdefense.org/authors/ray-l-flores-ii-esq/" target="_blank" rel="" style="text-decoration-line:underline;">Ray Flores</a>, senior outside counsel for CHD who has&nbsp;<a href="https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/george-watts-jr-pfizer-covid-vaccine-injury/" title="https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/george-watts-jr-pfizer-covid-vaccine-injury/" target="_blank" rel="" style="text-decoration-line:underline;">filed a separate suit</a><a href="https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/george-watts-jr-pfizer-covid-vaccine-injury/">&nbsp;</a>challenging the PREP Act, told The Defender, “At bottom, PREP is an amplified product liability statute that many courts have interpreted as being all-encompassing. To me, battery of a minor must be a separate issue outside of PREP.”</span></p></div></div></div></div></div></div></div>
</div><div data-element-id="elm_n7dZhx4-bJE64WTOIs9t2w" data-element-type="text" class="zpelement zpelem-text "><style></style><div class="zptext zptext-align-left " data-editor="true"><div style="color:inherit;"><p><span><a href="https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/tanner-smith-teenager-forced-covid-vaccination-pfizer-lawsuit/" title="https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/tanner-smith-teenager-forced-covid-vaccination-pfizer-lawsuit/" target="_blank" rel="" style="text-decoration-line:underline;">This article was originally published by The Defender</a> — Children’s Health Defense’s News &amp; Views Website under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. Please consider <a href="https://childrenshealthdefense.org/about-us/sign-up/" title="https://childrenshealthdefense.org/about-us/sign-up/" target="_blank" rel="" style="text-decoration-line:underline;">subscribing to The Defender</a> or <a href="https://childrenshealthdefense.org/about-us/donate/" title="https://childrenshealthdefense.org/about-us/donate/" target="_blank" rel="" style="text-decoration-line:underline;">donating to Children’s Health Defense</a>.</span></p></div></div>
</div></div></div></div></div></div> ]]></content:encoded><pubDate>Sat, 21 Sep 2024 16:52:00 -0500</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[How are we supposed to be confident in COVID-19 statistics when the tests are unreliable?]]></title><link>https://www.healnc.net/blogs/post/covid19-test-questions</link><description><![CDATA[<img align="left" hspace="5" src="https://www.healnc.net/images/untrustworthy test small.png"/>This is an open letter stating concerns about the testing used to diagnose COVID-19. It is our hope that you will download this letter &nbsp; and send i ]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="zpcontent-container blogpost-container "><div data-element-id="elm_hhnsHZhQTJ2A12lVSW3x9Q" data-element-type="section" class="zpsection "><style type="text/css"></style><div class="zpcontainer-fluid zpcontainer"><div data-element-id="elm_0R5PwMTXQNSDrw8GnVmAyQ" data-element-type="row" class="zprow zprow-container zpalign-items- zpjustify-content- " data-equal-column=""><style type="text/css"></style><div data-element-id="elm_9ofCpoNIRuGkvXd99eop9w" data-element-type="column" class="zpelem-col zpcol-12 zpcol-md-12 zpcol-sm-12 zpalign-self- "><style type="text/css"></style><div data-element-id="elm_CqBSYU1ZR1ScnXfKVEb8MA" data-element-type="text" class="zpelement zpelem-text "><style> [data-element-id="elm_CqBSYU1ZR1ScnXfKVEb8MA"].zpelem-text { border-radius:1px; } </style><div class="zptext zptext-align-center " data-editor="true"><p style="text-align:left;"><strong style="color:inherit;font-size:17.6px;"><em>This is an open letter stating concerns about the testing used to diagnose COVID-19. It is our hope that you will </em></strong><a href="/files/COVID-19-TESTS-UNTRUSTWORTHY.doc" target="_blank" rel="" download="" style="color:rgb(50, 174, 172);">download this letter</a><a href="https://healnc.net/s/COVID-19-TESTS-UNTRUSTWORTHY.doc" target="_blank" style="color:inherit;">&nbsp;</a><strong style="color:inherit;font-size:17.6px;"><em>and send it to everyone you deem necessary (local officials, public health committees, county commissioners, school boards, local newspapers, medical staff, etc.) Also please consider sharing this information on your social media. THIS LETTER HAS BEEN SENT TO ALL 170 NORTH CAROLINA SENATORS AND REPRESENTATIVES.</em></strong><br></p></div>
</div><div data-element-id="elm_fiyIVQjpgCTkdChBaSrcMw" data-element-type="image" class="zpelement zpelem-image "><style> [data-element-id="elm_fiyIVQjpgCTkdChBaSrcMw"].zpelem-image { border-radius:1px; } </style><div data-caption-color="" data-size-tablet="" data-size-mobile="" data-align="center" data-tablet-image-separate="" data-mobile-image-separate="" class="zpimage-container zpimage-align-center zpimage-size-medium zpimage-tablet-fallback-medium zpimage-mobile-fallback-medium hb-lightbox " data-lightbox-options="
                type:fullscreen,
                theme:dark"><figure role="none" class="zpimage-data-ref"><span class="zpimage-anchor" role="link" tabindex="0" aria-label="Open Lightbox" style="cursor:pointer;"><picture><img class="zpimage zpimage-style-none zpimage-space-none " src="/images/untrustworthy%20test%20small.png" size="medium" data-lightbox="true"/></picture></span></figure></div>
</div><div data-element-id="elm__Jemsye8rWQyO6ihjiQT-Q" data-element-type="text" class="zpelement zpelem-text "><style> [data-element-id="elm__Jemsye8rWQyO6ihjiQT-Q"].zpelem-text { border-radius:1px; } </style><div class="zptext zptext-align-left " data-editor="true"><p style="font-size:17.6px;">To Whom It May Concern,</p><p style="font-size:17.6px;"><br></p><p style="font-size:17.6px;">I am reaching out to you today to voice my concern over the problematic testing being used to diagnose individuals with COVID-19. Panic has gripped our nation and people watch the number of cases and deaths with great alarm. Based on these numbers, the American government is making unprecedented decisions concerning our freedoms, our national economy, and our way of life. It is the public assumption that the tests must be ironclad. However, a cursory amount of research has raised many red flags about the test’s reliability and purity.</p><p style="font-size:17.6px;"><br></p><p style="font-size:17.6px;"> The COVID-19 test has a history of producing <strong>false positive results</strong>. There are many news stories about people who received a COVID-19 diagnosis based on a positive test result. Later, these individuals were informed the results were incorrect, and follow up tests were negative.&nbsp;</p><ul><li><p>According to one <a href="https://www.livescience.com/matt-swider-stuck-in-egypt-coronavirus-quarantine.html" target="_blank" style="color:rgb(50, 174, 172);">article</a>, in March an American was held in Egypt after testing positive. Four days later, he tested negative along with at least four other people who had previously received a positive result.&nbsp;</p></li><li><p>Another <a href="http://thedanielislandnews.com/news/false-positive-covid-19-test-alarms-di-community" target="_blank" style="color:rgb(50, 174, 172);">article</a> titled “False Positive COVID-19 Test Alarms DI Community,” a young person tested positive and then later it was revealed that the test was faulty.&nbsp;</p></li><li><p>In <a href="https://www.vcstar.com/story/news/local/2020/03/14/coronavirus-update-california-child-tests-create-uncertainty-covid-19/5053099002/" target="_blank" style="color:rgb(50, 174, 172);">another news story</a>, an 8-year-old boy tested positive for COVID-19. Later, <strong><em>the same specimen</em></strong> was retested and received a negative result.&nbsp;</p></li><li><p>In late February, <a href="https://time.com/5789745/westerdam-coronavirus-false-positive/" target="_blank" style="color:rgb(50, 174, 172);">an American woman</a> received a false positive that was followed by two negatives.</p></li></ul><div><br></div><p style="font-size:17.6px;">This predilection toward false positive test results is highly concerning as it inflates the case numbers. These false positives are then counted toward the total number of cases and that information is used to prolong quarantine and the shutdown of our country as well as unnecessary isolation and medical intervention for the falsely diagnosed.</p><p style="font-size:17.6px;"><br></p><p style="font-size:17.6px;"> In addition to false positives, the COVID-19 test commonly returns <strong>false negatives</strong>.</p><ul><li><p><a href="https://www.montereyherald.com/2020/03/20/coronavirus-false-test-results-with-the-push-to-screen-come-questions-of-accuracy/" target="_blank" style="color:rgb(50, 174, 172);">According to the CDC</a> “the test can’t detect some strains of the virus…RNA viruses like the COVID-19 pathogen have a lot of genetic variability.” The genetic variability of COVID-19 undermines the ability for a test to be reliable.&nbsp;</p></li><li><p>Louisville’s chief health strategist, <a href="https://www.dispatch.com/news/20200329/you-can-test-negative-and-still-have-coronavirus-herersquos-why" target="_blank" style="color:rgb(50, 174, 172);">Dr. Sarah Moyer</a>, stated that the rate of false negatives could be as high as 40%.</p></li><li><p><a href="https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/coronavirus-testing#accuracy" target="_blank" style="color:rgb(50, 174, 172);">Medical News Today</a> investigated the accuracy of COVID-19 testing. “COVID-19 tests are new, and assessing their accuracy is challenging. PCR tests may produce false negatives, failing to identify evidence of SARS-CoV-2. Sometimes false negatives result from human error or problems with the procedure. Giving the test too early or late, for example, can lead to a false negative. The accuracy of similar tests for influenza is generally&nbsp;<a href="https://www.cdc.gov/flu/professionals/diagnosis/clinician_guidance_ridt.htm" target="_blank" style="color:rgb(50, 174, 172);">50–70%</a>.&quot;</p></li></ul><div><br></div><p style="font-size:17.6px;"> In addition to the possibility of false positives and false negatives, several news stories have covered incidences of batches of <strong>new tests being delivered already contaminated with COVID-19.&nbsp;</strong></p><ul><li><p>The <a href="https://www.foxnews.com/world/coronavirus-tests-uk-contaminated-covid-19" target="_blank"><span style="color:rgb(50, 174, 172);">Telegraph reported in the UK</span>&nbsp;</a>that “laboratories across the country were on Monday warned to expect a delay after traces of the virus were detected in parts due for delivery in the coming days.” Other articles state that “it was not clear in the email how the tests became contaminated.”</p></li><li><p>The US has dealt with similar issues. In fact, the lab manufacturing the testing kits was possibly contaminated.&nbsp;<a href="https://www.foxnews.com/health/cdc-lab-for-coronavirus-test-kits-may-contaminated-report" target="_blank" style="color:rgb(50, 174, 172);">Fox News reported</a>,&nbsp; &quot;The Trump administration has reportedly ordered an investigation into a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) lab in Atlanta that was in charge of assembling&nbsp;coronavirus&nbsp;test kits after a scientist with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) raised concerns that <strong><em>the lab itself</em></strong> may be ‘contaminated,’ possibly leading to faulty test kits, according to reports.”</p></li></ul><div><br></div><p style="font-size:17.6px;">Contamination of labs and testing kits is an enormous issue! How are we to trust the numbers being reported of COVID-19 cases and deaths if both the labs manufacturing the tests and the&nbsp;tests themselves have been found to be contaminated? It is also disconcerting that no answers have been found as to how the tests became contaminated during manufacturing. There’s also concern that using a contaminated test could actually infect a person.</p><p style="font-size:17.6px;"><br></p><p style="font-size:17.6px;"> With a large number of reports on false positives, false negatives, and contamination of tests and manufacturing sites, I am very concerned that we are not receiving accurate statistics regarding the number of actual cases of COVID-19.&nbsp;Our economy and way of life are at risk due to government response based on these test results. It has also been revealed that <a href="https://www.dailywire.com/news/epidemiologist-behind-highly-cited-coronavirus-model-admits-he-was-wrong-drastically-revises-model/?fbclid=IwAR2ZuBMTateZZaijPnK-qnq8iFmSv2rh1rOrD7IGEZAnIq-dic0KBXDKgvw" target="_blank" style="color:rgb(50, 174, 172);">the model</a> used to predict the scale of this pandemic was exaggerated. The result of using a false model has <a href="https://www.westernjournal.com/expert-covid-prediction-50k-hospitalizations-ny-april-1-turned-400-high/" target="_blank"><span style="color:rgb(50, 174, 172);">played out in New York</span>&nbsp;</a>where the predictions of how many cases they would see were found to be 400% too high! We are operating on faulty information from all fronts. </p><p style="font-size:17.6px;"><br></p><p><span style="color:inherit;"></span></p><p style="font-size:17.6px;"><strong>Please help me understand how Americans are supposed to trust the COVID-19 numbers when they are based on such untrustworthy information. </strong></p></div>
</div><div data-element-id="elm_IZZthQwORl2yKO0DmxOmEA" data-element-type="button" class="zpelement zpelem-button "><style> [data-element-id="elm_IZZthQwORl2yKO0DmxOmEA"].zpelem-button{ border-radius:1px; } </style><div class="zpbutton-container zpbutton-align-center "><style type="text/css"></style><a class="zpbutton-wrapper zpbutton zpbutton-type-primary zpbutton-size-lg zpbutton-style-none " href="/files/COVID-19-TESTS-UNTRUSTWORTHY.doc" download target="_blank"><span class="zpbutton-content">Download Letter</span></a></div>
</div></div></div></div></div></div> ]]></content:encoded><pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2020 09:52:00 -0500</pubDate></item></channel></rss>